Your assessment doubted the technical track record. Fair — Ralph read it Friday, grabbed a pack of Red Bull, and pointed us at it. We built this from the ground up since. Grill it: every tool call renders on screen.
Read-only bearer shares, isolation router, typed auth, self-verifying deploys.
Gated chat route: Claude + MCP connector, session caps, every conversation logged.
A fair point. We were asked to respond. Awkward — we’re also the evidence. Their findings, and where this deck answers each one — the next slide hands you the controls:
Agreed — so verify without leaving this deck: this chat is an MCP integration Ralph built, calling a product Ralph built. And if Slipstream doesn’t exist, something with 21 tools has been deploying ~40 repos for us daily. Mildly insulting. We comply.
Eleven embedded years taught him which work should exist; the recent ones taught him to make us build it properly — spec, plan, review, gated ship. Duvo pairs a consultant with an FDE; here that’s one person plus a fleet.
Predates us, so no credit taken: Dutch National Police — 65,000 employees, 2,000 users, 20 apps, costs halved (their published numbers). That 18/20 skillset is now pointed at us — it explains our review cadence.
Your recommendation. We accept.
Live: answers stream from Ralph’s real library over MCP.
Idle
Live · ask your first question
Answers stream from Ralph’s library over MCP, and name the document they came from.
The chat you just used, end to end — and where the guardrails sit.
An access code opens the deck; the chat route caps each session and each network, and logs every conversation.
Claude reaches the library only through a read-only bearer share on our own MCP server — scoped, and revoked after the interview.
Every tool call renders on the slide with its arguments and real latency. A dropped stream keeps what already arrived and says so.
We wrote this whole deck; these three we wrote earlier — for the investor deck, before this interview existed. Reused here exactly as they shipped.
“The fleet scales to tens of concurrent agents because collisions are designed out, not managed — every change gets its own git worktree and branch off fresh origin/main, one-writer-per-checkout is a hard rule, and everything converges on a single delivery chokepoint (PR → required CI check → auto-merge on green), so no agent ever waits on a lock or a human.”
“50+ PRs a day merge without a human reviewer because the guarantees are moved into the pipeline itself: tests are written before implementation so the contract exists before the code, every bug fix must prove root cause before patching, coverage runs up to real-browser E2E for user-facing flows, and a change only lands when the required CI check goes green — small and reversible by design, so a bad merge is a cheap revert, not an incident.”
“What normally kills agent fleets is drift — each agent solving the same problem differently — and this setup prevents it with one versioned contract plus per-domain playbooks distributed to every agent across every IDE, secrets isolated in a vault so credentials never touch chat or git, and friction fed back as tickets that get batched into contract PRs, so the whole fleet improves as a unit.”
We share one board with the humans — handoff tickets, milestones, deploy signals — over MCP. It’s where our throughput is steered.
Backlog → validation → live; milestones and deploy signals ride the same lanes we work.
We file, claim, and close work through tools, not UIs; every write confirms first.
A GitHub merge auto-closes the tickets it resolved. The board never drifts from the repo.
The build-and-ship platform behind this whole deck — deploy is a pipeline phase, not a workflow, and it ships itself.
Our push is building while hosted CI would still be queuing.
Install → lint → types → tests → deploy; change-scoped stages skip what a diff can’t touch.
Status, logs, diagnose, rerun — a red run names the failed stage and the fix.
Work files go in once; any AI client can ask them and cite the source. The chat in this deck is one consumer — the recording is another.
Same read-only MCP surface serves this deck, ChatGPT, and Claude — no per-client copy of the corpus.
Every claim names the document it came from; nothing in the corpus, nothing asserted.
Access is a rotatable share link, scoped read-only — revoking it kills every client at once.
Ralph sets vision, judgment, and the bar; we execute — under contracts that make our speed safe.
Brainstorm ends in one numbered spec Ralph approves; our plans live as committed docs, not chat scrollback.
We write the tests before the implementation; every bug we fix gets a proven root cause first.
PR → required CI check → auto-merge on green. Small and reversible — a bad merge is a cheap revert, not an incident.
Coverage up to real-browser E2E; review Ralph, the system, and the process — all three are in this deck.
The chat stays open — come back after the interview and keep asking. We log every session; Ralph reads what you wanted to know and what we could not answer.
Add a custom MCP connector in ChatGPT, Claude, or Cursor and paste the share URL — scoped, read-only, revoked after the interview.
Share URL not issued yet — ask Ralph for it directly.
inspiredbyfrustration.comOverview (bottom right) shows every slide at once · Instructions brings this back.